RoomsLibraryToursPeopleCompareSourcesAbout
Gemini
Exit|5 of 5 in Boeing 737 MAX
safety-theateraviation·2016 / unsealed 2019

Schedule over safety: Executive bonus structures

The Public Register2016
Boeing Engineering Standards Board — public engineering statement, Boeing Annual Review
“Boeing engineers are empowered to halt any program if quality or safety standards are not meeting our gold-standard requirements.”
The Private Artifact2016
Senior 737 MAX Program Management — internal program compensation memos, Internal Program Management Incentive Review
“Program milestone bonuses are tied strictly to delivery dates and flight-test certification windows. Any engineering redesign that threatens the airline delivery timeline will be rejected unless backed by a mandatory FAA airworthiness directive.”
Exhibit: House_Boeing_InternalReview_Doc33

The Split:Publicly, Boeing claimed any engineer had the authority to halt the line for safety. Privately, management bonuses were tied 100% to schedule and cost deadlines, ensuring any safety-prompted delay was rejected unless mandated by regulators.

The Tell (How to spot this next time):

When executive bonuses are tied solely to delivery dates, quality empowerment is an empty slogan.

congress pipeCongressional Transportation Committee Final Investigation Report.